MULTIPARADIGMA DALAM ETIKA DAN AKHLAK KEPERILAKUAN DIBIDANG ILMU AKUNTANSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53567/jtsyb.v13i1.5Keywords:
Interpretive Multiparidigma, Behavioral Accounting, Accounting ScienceAbstract
Accounting is a system that produces financial information that is used by its users for making a decision. The purpose of the information is to provide guidance in choosing the best course of action in allocating scarce resources in economic business activities. Thus, accounting cannot be separated from human behavior that requires information. To carry out daily activities or the surrounding environment. So that accounting is not something passive, but accounting will always evolve throughout its era. In this study will discuss about a debate between academics and practitioners "whether there is a relationship between behavioral accounting and accounting science in a multiparadigm point of view (Interpretivism). This study aims to determine how important behavioral accounting is in the field of accounting science (financial accounting, cost accounting). and management, and public sector accounting. This study uses an interpretive qualitative paradigm. This study attempts to explain the relationship between action and meaning. The research subjects are several lecturers in Indonesia who represent various fields of accounting. an accountant and manager in terms of financial accounting, cost and management, and finally public sector accounting. It is very clear that a manager and accountant is obliged to perform an ethical action must be in accordance with the standards or rules that have been set.
References
KHOMSIYAH, K. &. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi Keperilakuan: Pendekatan Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 2(2), 89-102.
Zhou, Q. K. (1989). Porous plastic optical fiber sensor for ammonia measurement. Applied optics, 28(11), 2022-2025.
Bertens, K. (1993). Etika K. Bertens. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Vol. 21.
Wylleman, A. (1966). De grondslag van de moraal. ijdschrift voor Filosofie, 28(4), 623-635.
Atmadja, A. T. (2013). Pergulatan metodologi dan penelitian kualitatif dalam ranah ilmu akuntans. Jurnal Akuntansi Profesi, 3(2).
Rahardjo, M. (2018). Paradigma Interpretif.
Lannai, D. S. (2014). Phenomenology Study About Performance Meaning At Indonesia Foundation (Case Studies At Wakaf Foundation Of Indonesian Muslim University). International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(5), 8-16.
Kamayanti. (2019). Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta Selatan: Yayasan rumah peneleh.
Libby, R. B. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, organizations and society, 27(8), 775-810.
Mowen, M. M. (2015). Cornerstones of managerial accounting. Cengage Learning.
Saladien (Performer). (2006, Desember 6-7). Rancangan Penelitian Kualitatif. Modul Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Pelatihan Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi, Malang, Jawa Timur, Malang.
Shonhadji, N. (2021). Penggunaan Teori Sosial dalam Paradigma Interpretif pada Penelitian Akuntansi. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(1), 49-68.
Wylleman, A. (1966). De grondslag van de moraal. ijdschrift voor Filosofie: 28(4), 623-635.
Camenisch, P. F. (1983). Grounding professional ethics in a pluralistic society. New York: Haven Publications hlm 48.
Sulastri, P. (2015). Akuntansi Keperilakuan Terhadap Pengembangan Akuntansi Manajemen. DHARMA EKONOMI, 17(32).
Jorio, H. S. (2021). ORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYEES ENGAGEMENT-THE CASE OF MOROCCAN COMPANIES. Journal of economic and social development, 8(1), 29-38.
Hofstedt, T. R. (1970). A Strategy for Behavioral Accounting Research. The Accounting Review, 45(1), 38–54.
Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. he Accounting Review, 61(4), 601–632.
R, H. T. (1970). A strategy for behavior accountng research. The Accounting Review, 45(1), 38-54.
Hofstedt, T. R. (45(1), 38-54). A strategy for behavioral accounting research. The Accounting Review, 1970.
Wylleman, A. (1966). De grondslag van de moraal. ijdschrift voor Filosofie, 28(4), 623-635.
Mulawarman, A. D. (2010). Integrasi Paradigma Akuntansi: Refleksi atas Pendekatan Sosiologi dalam Ilmu Akuntansi. urnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma,, 1(1), 155-171.
Radianto, W. E. (2015). Rekonstruksi Sistem Pengendalian Manajamen: Studi Fenomenologi Di Entrepreneurial University. Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Pemerintah, P. (n.d.). Peraturan Pemerintah No 71 Tahun 2010.
Kamayanti. (2019). Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta Selatan: yayasan Rumah Peneleh.
Wilkins, M. A. (2010). An Experimental Analysis of Accounting Judgments between US GAAP and IFRS Accountants.
Kem, R. &. (2007). Cambodian cancer incidence rates in California and Washington. 1998–2002. Cancer, 110(6), 1370-1375.
Miles, M. B. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher, 13(5), 20-30.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bertens, K. (1993). Etika K. Bertens. Gramedia Pustaka Utama., Vol 21.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Harfiahani Indah Rakhma Ningtyas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
